Reminder: This post contains 2691 words
· 8 min read
· by Xianbin
The ability of formalizing intuition is important. We already know the techniques of corruption bound. Basically, we need to show that the size of ϵ-monochromatic rectangle can be larger than 2−g(n)∣X∣∣Y∣. Then, there are at least 2g(n)-monochromatic rectangles, so the lower bound is Ω(log2g(n)).
To formally state the above intuition, we need to quantify the error. Let f:X×Y→O be a function and μ be any probability distribution on X×Y. We define γ=max{μ(S)∣S∈Γ is ϵ-error z-monochormatic} where Γ is a collection of subsets of the input set. For z∈O, we say that a subset S⊆I is called ϵ-error z-monochromatic for f under μ iff μ(S)−μ(S∩f−1(z))≤ϵμ(S), i.e., μ(S∩f−1(z))≥α⋅μ(S) where I is the input set.
Let ϵz→z′′ denote the total measure of inputs which the protocol answers z′ while the correct answer is z (correct to wrong). By definition, the protocol answer z on μ(f−1(z))+∑ϵz′→z′−∑ϵz→z′′ measure of the inputs.
By the definition of γ, any rectangle of measure larger than γ on which the protocol answers z must have at least ϵ proportion of its total measure on which the correct answer is not z. That is to say, for these b removing the correct answer that is z, the wrong answer must be at least ϵ a fraction of the remaining z.
So, for all z∈O, we have
∑ϵz′→z′≥ϵ[μ(f−1(z))+∑ϵz′→z′−∑ϵz→z′′−αz]
where αz=μ({x∣Π(x)=z,x∈⋃μ(R)≤γR}) is the total measure of the inputs in the rectangles of measure, at most γ on which the protocol outputs z.
After rearranging, we have
αz≥μ(f−1(z))−∑ϵz→z′′−(1/ϵ−1)∑ϵz′→z′.
Summing over the choices of z∈O, we have
z∈O′∑αz≥μ(f−1(O′))−ϵ′/ϵ
where ϵ′<ϵ⋅μ(f−1(O′)), O′⊂O.
Since there are at least ∑αz/γ rectangles, the lower bound is
log2(μ(f−1(O′))−ϵ′/ϵ)/γ).
This is the full theorem.
Theorem(corruption bound) Let Γ be the set of combinatorial rectangles on X×Y. Let f:X×Y→O,O′⊂O. We use μ to denote any probability distribution on X×Y, for ϵ′<ϵμ(f−1(O′)), we have
Rϵ′(f)≥Dϵ′μ(f)≥log2(μ(f−1(O′))−ϵ′/ϵ)/γ).
Reference
[1]. Beame, P., Pitassi, T., Segerlind, N. and Wigderson, A., 2006. A strong direct product theorem for corruption and the multiparty communication complexity of disjointness. computational complexity, 15, pp.391-432.